Emily Carr University Foundation Show

The first year show is always interesting and innovative. Here is a short silent video on some the wonderful creative projects produced by students. A web site about the show can be found here.
Can Machines Dream? (Five Parts)
The Magic of Apple is Really About the Magic of Design
Reflections on New Media (Nine Parts)
Artficial Worlds and the Cinema
Brain Images, Neurosciences, Cultural Theory
Bad News, Richard Posner and New Media
Research in the Arts and Design
The Practice of Interdisicplinarity in Design and New Media
Ceramics in the Material World
Dilemmas of Teaching and Learning
True Blood and the Culture of Vampires
Virtual/Real/Virtual (Three Part Series)
Social Networks and Virtual Communities
A Shallow Argument: Nicholas Carr + the Internet
Indigenous Images + Stories: The Case of Eric Michaels
Digital Culture Notes (First of a series)
From Quantum of Solace to Sherlock Holmes
Robert Frank and American Photography
From Community Media to International Networks
Reflections on the Documentary Cinema
There are three major essays on Roland Barthes within this web site.
Roland Barthes, Camera Lucida and Cultures of Vision
The first year show is always interesting and innovative. Here is a short silent video on some the wonderful creative projects produced by students. A web site about the show can be found here.
An important article on the relationship between art and design in the context of the development of new curriculum at the Royal College of Art in London.
What’s the point of reviewing a design book that is over 40 years old, long out of print and tied to the style and technology of 1968? Well, S. Neil Fujita’s Aim for a Job in Graphic Design/Art (Richards Rosen Press, New York) is a fount of professional intelligence for an emerging field. It is also a slice of lost graphic design history worth reprising.
by Steven Heller....read more.....
One of the most often repeated refrains on design blogs, in the critique of a new logo, is “Any design student could do a better job.” This ubiquitous comment is especially amusing to me because, well, it’s mostly true. If you judge virtually every new logo designed today by classical design school standards, the kids in school are doing a better job. This is because of the way logo and identity design are taught in so many schools, and what that exercise is meant to accomplish.
A brilliant article about architecture and the critic, Nicolai Ouroussoff of the New York Times by Alexandra Lange who teaches at the School of Visual Arts in New York.
"Architecture criticism cannot simply be about what’s new because that leads precisely to the globe-trotting, star-gazing, architecture-as-sculpture approach we have now. What we need is criticism that treats renderings and buildings as different, since users are the ultimate critics. We need criticism that connects us to a building’s references, emotions and textures, not only its news value. We need criticism moored to place, and to the history of that place, so that the ways forward multiply (and don’t only involve building something curvy). Ouroussoff is not good enough because he reinforces the worst trends in architectural culture, never explains where he comes from and never explores the many different places we might go."